 |
 |
For this very reason, the difference in optical path between two
partial, consecutive beams is quite high: in fact, in the incident direction
two corresponding rays coming from two consecutive steps follow the same
geometric path; but, while one is following the final stretch, corresponding
to height h of the step in the glass, the other follows it in the vacuum
and their optical paths differ by (n-1)h (n being the refraction index
of the glass).
Since the order m of the spectrum is given by the difference in the optical
path divided by the wavelength, in the exemplar that we present here,
since h=10.265 mm and making n=1.5 and l=500 nm, the result is m=10,300;
moreover, since N=12, the number of the plates, its resolving power is
mN=123,600.
In the echelette grating, since the order is quite high, the problem of
superimposition is highly accentuated; in fact, to ensure that the wavelength
component l¢ of the spectrum of order m is superimposed on the wavelength
component l of the spectrum of order m+1, the corresponding differences
in optical paths ml¢ and (m+1)l must be equal and the difference
l¢-l between the wavelengths of those components must be equal to
l/m and for l=500 nm it is equal to 0.05 nm.
To avoid superimposition the incident light must therefore be as monochromatic
as possible.
The echelette grating, like all high resolution instruments, is therefore
used in the study of the fine structure of the spectral lines: the line
to be studied is isolated by means of a prism or grating spectroscope
(monochromator) and delivered to the spectroscope slit in which
the echelette grating has been placed.
|
 |
 |